Everyone needs an editor

By Caitlin Kelly

Like those narrow bits of whalebone that once shaped women’s corsets — invisible aids to visible beauty — editors save writers daily.

They catch our grammatical errors, query an assertion, challenge an opinion. The very best are gentle-but-firm and help us create terrific material. The worst are butchers.

Yet writers very rarely publicly acknowledge how essential their skills are to our more obvious success.

 

thumbnail-5

Each story we read has been edited,  some more rigorously than others…

 

One editor recently made a whole pile of new enemies on Twitter when he declared that  most of the writing he reads is only made useful thanks to editors. That self-satisfied burn was not appreciated.

But a recent New York Times Book Review piece recounted how zealously and carefully one writer had been managed by her book editor. And nowhere does she explain (!) that this is now as rare and luxurious an experience as having a car and driver, butler or valet, let alone all three. I know no writers getting this kind of literal hands-on attention to their work.

By Ruth Reichl:

Susan’s ability to read my mind astonished me; our editing sessions often felt like a visit to a psychiatrist. I’d arrive at her cluttered office every few months to find my latest pages sitting in the middle of her desk, covered with pencil scrawls and festooned with little yellow Post-its. We’d pull up chairs, eat lunch (always sushi), chat about our families. Then we’d push the plates away and go through the manuscript page by page. Susan would lean across the desk, fix those large expressive eyes on me, point at a paragraph. “Are you sure he’d do that?” “What are you really trying to say here?” “I have a feeling you don’t like this woman. Can you put it into words?” Answering her questions, I’d find myself saying things I hadn’t even known I thought.

The late editor, Susan Kamil, sat beside her in her office, going over Reichl’s work line by line. This, in an era when even agents have little time or energy to spare the plebes, let alone the P & L-obsessed editors they hope to sell us to.

 

malled cover LOW

 

I won’t soon forget getting the notes on my last book, sitting in a motel room in Victoria, B.C. while visiting my mother. My editor, who had previously worked for NASA (it is rocket science!) liked chapters 11 and 12.

What about Chapters 1 through 10?

I panicked. That is a lot of revision!

A dear friend, also a writer, gave me very good advice: “You’re the mechanic. Fix the engine.”

Thanks to Courtney’s calm and thorough suggestions — certainly not in her office, nor line by line or page by page — we got it done. Then, just as the book was going into final production, we went at it again, tweaking a few pages.

Digital story-telling makes it too easy to later fix a published mistake. Book editing is a high-wire act in comparison.

This past summer offered me the highs and lows of what it means to work with an editor. One, a rude young woman with very little understanding of the collaborative nature of this endeavor, left me shaking with frustration. Another, a man my age, has offered some direction, but has given me tremendous autonomy on a major story, the most complex in many years.

Like all writers, I will be nervous until it goes live, hopefully in the next few months.

That final moment of submission — yes, double meaning — is always scary!

 

14 thoughts on “Everyone needs an editor

  1. The editor for “Rose” was a God-send. Saw a lot of problems I had never considered, and gave me room to figure out what to do so I could fix them. The result is “Rose” is out now and doing well. Hopefully with the next book, I’ll have similar results.

  2. anyone who does not accept or acknowledge that words need polishing and tweaking is lying to themselves. editors are a special breed and much needed for both the writer’s and the reader’s sake. best of luck with your new piece.

  3. I love my editor who lives in London. She totally respects the work (and the writer) while offering gentle (and spot on) suggestions that I always heed. She’s also very funny. Any writer who believes they don’t need an editor is deluded. A writer NEEDS an editor, sometimes TWO.

      1. The ones that butcher shouldn’t even be called “editors”; they should be doing something else, and one wonders how they even got into such a profession. Once, I had a huge argument with a so-called “editor” (via email) over the word ‘lucent’. Just to say that writers should be very careful who they choose to edit their work, because an incompetent can wreck it. Here’s a very good website that I recommend:

        https://reedsy.com/

      2. The one who butchered me this summer already worked for Harper’s (considered one the nation’s most elite magazines) and now (irony) edits other journalists at cjr.org. She is a total disaster and I have named her to many writers and editors to avoid — my letter to the man who hired and retained her? No reply. So there’s your answer.

  4. Pingback: [BLOG] Some Tuesday links | A Bit More Detail

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s